What a great speech by McCain. He talked of things Democrats don't understand. Things like patriotism, things like personal responsibility, things like individuality.
Democrats may not understand these things, but many who THINK they are Democrats because the party was ONCE great, or because they've been brainwashed into not thinking at all, DO believe in these things. There's none of them on the left and McCain made clear (yet again) that they are the very stuff of the right.
As you know, I am not supporting McCain at this time. I prefer Guiliani. But my differences with McCain are not in vision but in policy. In other words, Hillary Rodham-Clinton and Barack H. Obama do not believe in personal responsibility, they believe in a welfare state where riches are entitlements that come with no responsibility at all. Ms. Rodham-Clinton made exactly this point in his "Happy Holiday" ad in which she sees the people as children and herself as Santa Claus giving all the "nice children" free healthcare and better schools and more money.
Democrats do not believe in patriotism. They don't consider themselves Americans. They believe themselves to be "citizens of the world." Patriotism scares them for the Democrat sees it as "xenophobia," perfectly exemplified by B. Obama's refusal to show the flag and the national anthem honor at his gatherings and the only-during-election-year wearing of American flag pins by the leftists.
Democrats do not believe in individuality. They only believe in "being yourself" so long as "yourself" is exactly like them. If you think differently you must be stifled for "hate speech," if you're black and you don't vote Democrat you're attacked as an "Uncle Tom" or worse.
This race is really between America and the anti-Americans and I am convinced that the vast majority of Americans -- even those who mindlessly vote Democrat -- love this country and recognize it's greatness and that greatness needs to be defended.
So, if the nominee were McCain...or Giuliani...or Mitt...or Huckabee...or...Thompson, I'd proudly support them knowing I'm supporting America and the values that made America great.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
458 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 401 – 458 of 458Not to mention Simes, who's claim to history is that he's won more Rice-O-Roni on quiz shows than anyone ever has.
It's not that it's a trap, Farmer...
No...really, it's a trap. Now I've got you you mf'er!
You're right, they just pay me $3,100/week to do nothing.
I can think of worse expenditures... like trying to get you to actually do something...
Chow main. Hasty bananas!
Dora,
Maybe if you spent less time insisting you're a super-genius law student / well paid-lawyer / economist / mortgage insurer / whatever you claim next week, and more time demonstrating extra-Wikipedia knowledge in any of these fields, people wouldn't be convinced you're an Arby's girl.
Right, Arby's girl?
That sentence didn't even make sense.
I'm trying to figure out what it was that made Bimbo so angry at me -- is it just my salary, or how we tag-teamed him on "his Hoover's 90% tax rate caused the depression" nonsense?
Or maybe when I talked about how small all of their dicks are. Cuz when you have nothing else going for you, you can at least look to dick size to get some manly self-esteem, but if you don't even have that, then you have absolutely nothing going for you (at least that's how they think).
I thought Beam was leaving...I guess he didn't want us to see him with his tail between his legs. Bad choice, dimwit...the longer you stay, the dopier you get...and now you've got Farmer sounding ordinary stupid instead of pedantic stupid. Let's give these boys a whole new topic they can shine at. How about Limbaugh saying he might not support a GOP candidate this time. I think he's hoping the Hitler clone will show up.
FJ,
Of course Hillary's going to apply Alinsky's strategies against Obama. She has him at a distinct disadvantage there, being slightly more experienced at being in the White House than most of the new hired people in the travel office.
But, even if she didn't, she'd fake a Southern drawl and cornpone him to death with "but you're black."
"that sentence didn't make any sense"
Who said leftists had reading comprehension skills?
Not I.
Simes,
I'll leave you with a box of Rice-A-Roni and Dora's dick size expertise.
See ya tomorrow!
I think some of these guys may have big dicks but are too clumsy to use them. They are very simian.
Ah, you're right, it did make sense.
Why are you so obsessed with me being an "arby's girl"? I mean, think logically, my dear, how could i work at arby's and be posting here so often? Insults are best when they are believable. Otherwise, it's just nonsense.
Bah bye bimbo.
Dora's dick size expertise
And your point is? :)
Maybe Beamish is a virgin... nah, I bet he lost it when he was in his mid to late twenties, though.
Conservative talk radio pundit Rush Limbaugh has been finding it easier to identify candidates he dislikes in the Republican presidential primaries than anyone he might support.
Some analysts even believe that Mike Huckabee's disappointing third-place finish in the Michigan primary was a result of Limbaugh's constant claims that Huckabee is not a true conservative and that his nomination could destroy the Republican Party.
Now Limbaugh has gone a step further, telling his listeners that he's not too fond of McCain either and that "I can see possibly not supporting a Republican nominee" because "you don't have a genuine down-the-list conservative."
Limbaugh himself was not enthusiastic about any of the Republican candidates, even Romney, concluding that "it's going to come down to which guy do we dislike the least."
Maybe Beamish is a virgin... nah, I bet he lost it when he was in his mid to late twenties, though.
Why, is that when his little sister hit thirteen?
McBeamICK:Smacked Down,
Granted. Leftists have never seen a thought,Not here much less produced one,a history/ philosophy-challenged whacko, like yourself, would not be aware of the great liberal thinkers so it's probably not prudent to ask a leftist to pick a thought out of a line up. A line up that doesn't include a thought would not be a line up from which one can select a thought. Btw, how apropos is it that line up should appear as an analogy with a neo-con.
So you're whining about something else? What is that?
Beam said: Simes,
I'll leave you with a box of Rice-A-Roni and Dora's dick size expertise.
Thank you; I'll try to explore that.
Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...
Smacked Down,
I brought up Smoot-Hawley to show why / how Hoover's 63% tax rate was in effect really a 90% tax rate to anyone who still had money to spend during the Great Depression.
That argument has already been put to rest--repeatedly. And, yet parrot that you are, you keep repeating the same falsehood. Go and google the timeline for the Depression, if need be. You are weird...and so is your KKKrazy blog.
actionsspeaklouderthanwords said...
Where the hell are the FACTS, buster?
You are the facts, smackaddict! You side with the terrorists and how do you act at this blog? Like a terrorist, of course.... disrupting instead of contributing.
That's a real contribution. Answer the question. Where is there a fact in Suckett's diatribe...other than what he believes, fool?
2.5" max. Can you say limp biscuits?
Farmer John said...
I can only hope that dora washes her hands after maneuvering her tiller...
What on earth are you talking about? Masturbation? I suppose you think that that is immoral, too,jack-off?
Hey, Smackdown, your ISP is not working. You aren't receiving mail.
Hey, Smackdown, your ISP is not working. You aren't receiving mail.
Masturbation? I suppose you think that that is immoral, too,jack-off?
Who needs to masturbate? Surely not you? Loser! LOL!
omg, that's right, I totally forgot. Farmer John is against masturbation because masturbating leads to promiscuity.
He can fill you in on the details.
Farmer John said...
Masturbation? I suppose you think that that is immoral, too,jack-off?
Who needs to masturbate? Surely not you? Loser! LOL!
You have NEVER masturbated, FJ? Other than the mental masturbation that you publicly perform here? No wonder you are such an uptight azzhole.
No no, here's how i understand it: he thinks that when you have sex with someone, that person's face is imprinted on your mind and associated with the feeling of sex. So when you masturbate either to porn or fantasy, the images you see in your imagination or porn are being imprinted in your mind in place of real people. And somehow, because of these imprints of many different people because of masturbation, that makes you more prone to promiscuity. Which is bad.
Step away from the crazy man slowly.
No no, here's how i understand it: he thinks that when you have sex with someone, that person's face is imprinted on your mind and associated with the feeling of sex. So when you masturbate either to porn or fantasy, the images you see in your imagination or porn are being imprinted in your mind in place of real people. And somehow, because of these imprints of many different people because of masturbation, that makes you more prone to promiscuity. Which is bad.
To be fair, you will never truly understand the mind of a man. I don't agree with him 100%, but dwelling in porn or in lust are not healthy behaviors. That's one of the factors that causes the sicko child molesters and rapists to do the horrible things they do. Let me put it another way, when a man is aroused, he is not thinking clearly. All women that have slept with men know this. A man is a different creature before and after sex. Men would do well for themselves to avoid porn and masturbation. They are addicting and can cause a serious, long term self imposed distortion of reality.
Let me put it another way, when a man is aroused, he is not thinking clearly. All women that have slept with men know this. A man is a different creature before and after sex.
This sounds overly simplistic. do you think you're giving yourself enough credit as a man to generalize about yourself and all other men this way? Or are all men the same?
Men would do well for themselves to avoid porn and masturbation. They are addicting and can cause a serious, long term self imposed distortion of reality.
Gambling and alcohol can also be addictive, but just because some people can become addicted to them doesn't mean everyone should avoid them.
Plus, the ladies love porn and masturbation too, dontcha know.
dwelling in porn or in lust are not healthy behaviors.
What exactly is "dwelling in lust"?
That's one of the factors that causes the sicko child molesters and rapists to do the horrible things they do.
But that doesn't mean that porn and masturbation cause those behaviors, nor does it mean that most men who engage in masturbation or porn-watching/looking are going to end up as child molesters. Most child molesters and rapists also breathe air and wear clothes, but that doesn't mean we should avoid breathing air and wearing clothes.
According to surveys, more than 90% of men masturbate, but not 90% are rapists.
To me, railing against porn/masturbation has the Christian anti-sex streak to it, real bad.
Smacked Down,
You believe the Great Depression began with the stock market crash on Octboer 29, 1929 and that the Smoot-Hawley Act spread the depression to the rest of the world.
You couldn't be further wrong.
The Great Depression began in Europe in 1928, and spread worldwide from there.
Smoot-Hawley made things worse in the United States and did no favors for international trade, which was already hurting as other countries were enacting their own protectionist measures.
You really ought to study history and economic philosophy some time. I must warn you, though. Such an education makes it difficult to be a leftist.
Thanks for the compliment on my blog. "Weird" is what I was going for. You ought to lay off the senseless bandying about of the KKK label though. I've never voted for a Democrat in my life, and further, my family reunions look like a United Nations General Assembly meeting. I'm too "dark-skinned" and "mixed" to join the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party. Sorry. My family was fighting the KKK back when it was legal to shoot the sheet wearing goatfuckers. You know, before the ACLU came along.
I'm curious though. You mentioned that there exists some great "liberal" thinkers. I realize that there are a few. Voltaire's one of my favorites.
But are there any great leftist thinkers?
I don't have a problem with liberals. Given time and proper coaxing, even a liberal can accidently say something not so perceptibly retarded.
My beef is with leftists. I don't believe leftists can be great thinkers. I'm actually quite skeptical about the idea of thought occuring inside a leftist's head. There's no historical evidence for this concept.
Can you point me towards a leftist thinker I should be aware of?
Mike, is there some reason to believe that women do not masturbate? Both sexes masturbate, even as children--infants.
Beamish, could you elaborate on the difference between a liberal and a leftist?
smackdown said...
Mike, is there some reason to believe that women do not masturbate? Both sexes masturbate, even as children--infants.
Good good, smackdown, don't you get it?! Women are pure and virtuous, they don't do "dirty" things like masturbation or watch porn, they don't have "dirty" sexual thoughts. If they do have sexual needs and wants, those are of the married, vanilla sex kind, nothing else.
Plus, the ladies love porn and masturbation too, dontcha know.
...and are no longer getting married and settling for a single lifelong monogamous relationship.
Coincidence?
The brain rewards and punishes human behaviors through the release of neurochemicals. That's how people and all animals get programmed... carrots and sticks.
But go ahead and marry a guy who masturbates w/porn 2x a day. He won't be tempted to cheat on you... at least not w/some skank uglier than you. LOL!
...and are no longer getting married and settling for a single lifelong monogamous relationship.
Coincidence?
they're marrying less, and later, but they're cohabitating more.
is that bad?
But go ahead and marry a guy who masturbates w/porn 2x a day. He won't be tempted to cheat on you... at least not w/some skank uglier than you. LOL!
So your world, people who look at porn are more likely to cheat?
Weird.
Beamish, could you elaborate on the difference between a liberal and a leftist?
Leftism sub-divides into two main branches, communist (international socialism) and fascist (national socialism), and those branches split even further into more branches. The unifying aspects of all of these leftist factions are:
- They all claim to be "for the people," but when they achieve power, their definition of "people" is revealed to be much narrower than "everybody." For example, the leftists of Nazi Germany and the leftists of the Soviet Union were very much united in their hatred of Jews, a traditional leftist stance grounded in the writings of Proudhon, Marx, Engels, Bakunin, etc. You see the same today with leftists narrowing the definition of "people" to exclude children still in the womb, or comatose people in hospitals.
- All leftists detest the concepts of individual liberty and property rights, and seek to trample these, usually while claiming the afflictions upon the thusly collectively oppressed are "for their own good." Again, a good example would be the leftists of Nazi Germany. Look at what happened to Jewish property and Jews there. Or years before in the Soviet Union under Lenin's chekas and Trotsky's and Stalin's gulags. You can even trace this back to Robespierre, the forerunner of all forms of leftism and champion of state terror.
- Followers of leftist philosophies never see the result of their own way of thinking, as if everyone in history that preceeded them in following the same philosophies somehow "got it wrong" (the old "don't use Zyklon-B, use AK-47s" argument)
Liberals are what Stalin called "useful idiots." A liberal, with proper education and healthy appreciation for history and reality, does not remain a liberal for long.
The difference? There is some overlap, but there is a distinction.
Liberals are capable of learning. Leftists are not.
Dora...you should be ashamed of yourself for winding beamish up...this bonehead is too stupid even for this site. But I guess it is fun to see him still trying to cover his red ass on that depression thing... poor dipstick.
So can a leftist be Jewish? Can a leftist advocate for individual autonomy, as liberals constantly do? Are conservatives who support the death penalty and hate Muslims and "illegals" therefore leftists?
I don't see the contours of your definition very well.
So can a leftist be Jewish?
Yes.
Can a leftist advocate for individual autonomy, as liberals constantly do?
Yes. But they rarely mean it, and certainly not for the majority of individuals outside themselves. Are you confusing liberals with libertarians? Liberals constantly advocate government solutions, not individual autonomy.
Are conservatives who support the death penalty and hate Muslims and "illegals" therefore leftists?
Penalty...hmm...penal... you're implying crime is being punished by the death penalty here. By that I mean actual crime, not leftist "being Jewish is a crime" or "sub-prime lending to people who never pay their bills is fraud crime" bullshit.
It's not "leftist" to want laws to be enforced, no.
Your "conservatives hate Muslims" statement is rather vague without some examples, but yes, a "being a Muslim is a crime" style belief is essentially leftist in pedigree. I'd take any would be "conservative" to task for holding such a view.
Keep Robespierre, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, etc. on the left side of the political spectrum where they belong. Comfortably. Unquestionably.
is that bad?
I dunno. Ask the kids.
So your world, people who look at porn are more likely to cheat? . Nope, just fall in love with airbrushed unatainable supermodels and never
get married.
So long as there's porn, ugly lawyer chicks will never find a monogamous mate and their kids will never have daddies.
Blooger, McBeamish evidently just loves having his ass kicked over and over again on the smt.
Your "conservatives hate Muslims" statement is rather vague without some examples, but yes, a "being a Muslim is a crime" style belief is essentially leftist in pedigree. I'd take any would be "conservative" to task for holding such a view.
So, like that blogger Lionheart, or that politician who said that we need to put a cop outside of every mosque to make sure nothing fishy is going on, and anyone who advocates profiling for muslims, because the presumption is that muslims are more likely to be criminals of certain kinds, right?
Keep Robespierre, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, etc. on the left side of the political spectrum where they belong. Comfortably. Unquestionably.
LOL. Sad.
So your world, people who look at porn are more likely to cheat? . Nope, just fall in love with airbrushed unatainable supermodels and never
get married.
Is that a problem?
So long as there's porn, ugly lawyer chicks will never find a monogamous mate and their kids will never have daddies.
Aw, Farmer. I love how you never miss an opportunity to take a shot at my looks and my accomplishments, and to try to imply that "daddy" pays for everything (where in reality, when I had my stuff paid for, it was by my mommy).
I LOVE it that you're so jealous of my life. :)
I'm happy you're happy. The world is your oyster and I'm glad that you've discovered, and are living, the good life. I only wish you'd stop trying to drag the rest of us, kicking and screaming, into it. ;-)
I only wish you'd stop trying to drag the rest of us, kicking and screaming, into it. ;-)
Ah, this old canard, as if I'm trying to make you have extramarital sex.
Don't you get anything that's going on around you?!
I'd offer that FJ not only "gets" what's going on, he's trying to tell you, Dora.
When you're older, you'll understand.
Smacked Down,
If you're ever going to get around to "kicking my ass" in a discussion of the causes of the Great Depression, I'd love to see it.
You thought it began in America until I educated you otherwise.
Yeah, you're going to "kick my ass"
in a discussion of the global effects of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act.
Not.
Your "conservatives hate Muslims" statement is rather vague without some examples, but yes, a "being a Muslim is a crime" style belief is essentially leftist in pedigree. I'd take any would be "conservative" to task for holding such a view.
So, like that blogger Lionheart, or that politician who said that we need to put a cop outside of every mosque to make sure nothing fishy is going on, and anyone who advocates profiling for muslims, because the presumption is that muslims are more likely to be criminals of certain kinds, right?
I believe it was the left that went freaking nuts about how "fighting wars in Islamic lands will only create more terrorists (among the people we apparently shouldn't profile at the airport)."
I believe it was the Left that went into high shriek mode when Dubai, arguably the most modernized and Westernized emirate of all of the United Arab Emirates (Britain finally granted them independence in 1971), won a bid to use American ports for their shipping operations - because they's Ay-rabs and Moo-slims! - so the deal was cancelled.
(Never mind that Chinese military-owned shipping companies run port operations up and down the West Coast, and that Saudi Arabia has been operating port facilities in 14 coastal American cities since the early 1990's)
I believe it's the left that screams for bombing Saudi Arabia (almost as much as Osama Bin Laden himself does) because "the hijackers wuz Saudi Arabians."
So excuse me if I find that your implications that intolerance of Muslims is a hallmark of conservatives falls on the mendacious side of the line between reality and absolute bullshit.
I don't quite know what to make of the blogger Lionheart's predicament. Britain, in the first place, does not have freedom of expression as Americans know it. They tax and license TV ownership over there, you know. If he's a BNP supporter, he's not anything recognizable as an American conservative - the BNP's socialist domestic policy agenda would find an echo in America's Democratic Socialists wing of the DNC, and Democrat "elder statesman" Senator Robert Byrd no doubt would feel right at home with the white supremacist elements. From what I've read (which isn't much) this "Lionheart" denies ties to the BNP. I don't know either way.
That said, I don't know who this politician is that said that police should be posted outside every mosque, so I can't answer that.
Could you be less vague?
He lives in Vague, beamish. Anywhere else, he'd be invisible.
You thought it began in America until I educated you otherwise.
I thought Hoover's imaginary 90% tax rate caused it, and as far as I understand it, Hoover was president of America?
Poor Beamish. I feel sorry for him. It's like kicking a puppy.
So excuse me if I find that your implications that intolerance of Muslims is a hallmark of conservatives falls on the mendacious side of the line between reality and absolute bullshit.
Okay. I think we have conclusive evidence that Beamish is posting from the computer lab of a mental institution.
I don't quite know what to make of the blogger Lionheart's predicament. Britain, in the first place, does not have freedom of expression as Americans know it. They tax and license TV ownership over there, you know. If he's a BNP supporter, he's not anything recognizable as an American conservative - the BNP's socialist domestic policy agenda would find an echo in America's Democratic Socialists wing of the DNC, and Democrat "elder statesman" Senator Robert Byrd no doubt would feel right at home with the white supremacist elements. From what I've read (which isn't much) this "Lionheart" denies ties to the BNP. I don't know either way.
It's not about the BNP, dear heart. Whether or not he supports the BNP, the man hates all Muslims.
That said, I don't know who this politician is that said that police should be posted outside every mosque, so I can't answer that.
Could you be less vague?
New Huckabee Adviser Called For ‘A Cop In Front Of Every Mosque’ Just ‘For Safe Keeping’
New Huckabee Adviser Called For ‘A Cop In Front Of Every Mosque’ Just ‘For Safe Keeping’
...what a loving gesture...keeping every Muslim in America safe from anti-Muslim extremists! Sounds like a plan.
Oh, there's so much more from this Huckabee advisor:
- In a 2005 column, Pinkerton advocated genocide in Iraq, writing that America can make “anti-American violence in Iraq end” by unleashing “the Shia Arab Muslims and the Kurds to finish the job, all the way to the bloody extreme.”
- On Fox News in June 2006, Pinkerton complained about people who feel the “military needs to be carefully restrained with legal rules and procedures,” exclaiming “I’d rather lose our civil liberties than lose the war.”
- In December 2006, Pinkerton argued that “proximity to Mexico is at least partly to blame” for corruption in Texas.
- In September 2007, Pinkerton warned in the American Conservative of “Muslimization,” concluding that “to keep the peace, we must separate our civilizations.”
It's not about the BNP, dear heart. Whether or not he supports the BNP, the man hates all Muslims.
If he's a BNP supporter, he's not a conservative.
If he "hates all Muslims," he's not a conservative.
Bigotry is not conservative.
Since you don't want to answer my main points about how the left believes fighting wars in Islamic lands "creates" terrorists, how the left believes Dubai shouldn't have port operations in the United States because they're Arabs, and that Saudi Arabia should be bombed because most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi citizens, I would remind you of all the bigoted anti-Christian ramblings from your leftist friends, easily found on this site alone.
If vague, bigoted sweeping generalizations towards any religion's followers are ALL I can find from people claiming to be leftists, do you mind if that's the conclusion I draw? Your leftists are the bigots.
As far as Huckabee's advisor, I don't know much about him, but Huckabee himself is as out-of-his-league in foreign policy discussions as any of the Democrat frontrunners (or any Democrat, for that matter) and Hucksterbee's advisor writing for Pat Buchanan's aptly misnamed magazine doesn't make him a conservative either.
Sounds like he'd be welcome at Robert Byrd's dinner table. Needless to say, Pat Buchanan ran screaming from the GOP. No conservatives noticed.
If this is all you've got to prove your "conservatives hate Muslims" assertions, Dora, pack it in now.
You're blowing smoke, as usual.
Ah, ok, I see you're basically saying that anyone who you don't like or is inconvenient for the GOP is not really a conservative.
True scotsman, anyone?
Since you don't want to answer my main points about how the left believes fighting wars in Islamic lands "creates" terrorists,
Yeah, just like fighting wars in Ireland creates terrorists.
how the left believes Dubai shouldn't have port operations in the United States because they're Arabs,
Arabs or Muslims? You can't even keep your thougths straight. I bet it's time for your Rispedral again.
and that Saudi Arabia should be bombed because most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi citizens,
Um, that argument was slightly more subtle than that.
I would remind you of all the bigoted anti-Christian ramblings from your leftist friends, easily found on this site alone.
If vague, bigoted sweeping generalizations towards any religion's followers are ALL I can find from people claiming to be leftists, do you mind if that's the conclusion I draw? Your leftists are the bigots.
So, now you're saying that "leftists" are just "religious bigots"?
Ah, ok, I see you're basically saying that anyone who you don't like or is inconvenient for the GOP is not really a conservative.
True scotsman, anyone?
I am the King of Scotland. ;)
Regardless, that's not what I'm saying.
What I'm saying is someone who (in the case of Pat Buchanan) advocates market protectionism over free trade is not a conservative.
What I'm saying is someone who (in the case of Huckabee's advisor) who believes the government should champion one religion over another is not a conservative.
These are basics, and there are the same cultural, economic, and social branches from the core of conservative thought (the government that governs least governs best) where the ideological battles are fought.
I'm just pointing out the obvious. Where's Pat Buchanan? Where's Huckabee?
Are conservative voters so few in number that they can't get their boys on the political battleground?
Then who are you leftists ranting about?
Not conservatives, obviously.
Pinkerton for President! Huckabee is luckt to have him!
Post a Comment